What the community is saying about Arknights: Endfield
32 insights | Last updated: 2026-01-20 | Page 3 of 3
Community worried about short banner duration. Questions about rerun frequency and ability to reach 120 guarantee in 17 days. Seen as new player trap for casuals who may fail to reach pity before banner ends.
Major community backlash against urgent recruitment tickets: 30 pulls grant 10 temporary pulls that don't count toward 120 guarantee. Called 'misleading,' 'confusing,' 'predatory FOMO bait.' 120 pity doesn't carry over between banners. Many players going ultra-F2P or losing interest. High engagement: 235 comments on main post.
Players seeking clarification on whether rewards require starting day one, if they're permanent for pre-registered players who can't play at launch, and sign-in mechanics. Confusion about availability windows.
Excitement about Arknights Endfield advertisements in Times Square Station NYC. Viewed as cool and impressive marketing reach, generating hype and visibility for the game.
Multiple players reporting device compatibility problems, including phone incompatibility and PS5 release uncertainty. Some users with debt can't upgrade devices, GeForce Now dependency for Linux users, kernel-level anti-cheat concerns.
Overwhelmingly positive response to receiving 6* character Ardelia for free. Many players were prepared to reroll specifically for her, making this a major relief. Character considered 'best standard 6*' by beta players.
Players express confusion and frustration with the complex permit/currency system having multiple types (standard vs limited, banner-specific expiring pulls). Many find the system deliberately complex and anti-consumer.
Heated discussion over whether launch rewards are truly 'generous'. Many players argue the rewards are standard for new gacha launches, with limited pulls being insufficient for the 120 pity system. Concerns about post-honeymoon phase reward sustainability.