What the community is saying about Arknights: Endfield
118 Feedback insights | Last updated: 2026-03-13 | Page 8 of 10
Some users mention power sourcing challenges and alternatives like batteries, suggesting improvements for ease of use while acknowledging the dedication required.
Players appreciate the intentional lack of climbing, leading to clever space-involved puzzles and exploration, contrasting with over-powered mobility in genres like Genshin/Wuwa. This sparks discussions on smart level design and whether it's a strength or limitation.
Players express strong frustration that the gacha system requires 25-30 hours of intensive gameplay to accumulate 120 pulls within a 2-week banner, with no pity carryover, making it inaccessible for those with limited time (e.g., jobs, daily commitments). Many share personal experiences of slower progress and fear of missing limited characters.
Tutorials, especially for factory mechanics, are criticized as excessive and annoying, with many players skipping them or feeling handheld, leading to user fatigue and calls for better accessibility.
Community feels game is 70% factory optimization vs 30% combat, contrary to advertised 50/50 split
Main plot and characters described as shallow with underdeveloped Landbreakers faction
Combat system described as repetitive with same rotation patterns, lacking strategic depth and character uniqueness
Players highly satisfied with smooth 60FPS performance and optimization
Players demand compensation ('Apologems') for launch disaster affecting trust in developer
Players report tutorials are overbearing, time-consuming, and poorly timed. Tutorials appear after players have already figured out mechanics, force redundant actions like crafting items already automated, and include mandatory simulations of completed tasks. Multiple players considering quitting due to tutorial frustration.
Player asking what team to run when missing Xaihi character. Indicates lack of flexibility in team building when certain characters unavailable, possibly due to limited roster or specific character dependencies.
Player discovered initial blueprint was inefficient, overproducing batteries. Updated blueprint still has approval issues. Indicates players actively testing and optimizing base layouts, suggesting need for better in-game blueprint tools or validation.